THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING MODEL ON ACADEMICPROCRASTINATION OF COLLEGE STUDENTS

dc.contributorLIU FANGYUANen
dc.contributorLIU FANGYUANth
dc.contributor.advisorPasana Chularuten
dc.contributor.advisorพาสนา จุลรัตน์th
dc.contributor.coadvisorPasana Chularuten
dc.contributor.coadvisorพาสนา จุลรัตน์th
dc.contributor.emailadvisorpasana@swu.ac.th
dc.contributor.emailcoadvisorpasana@swu.ac.th
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot Universityen
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-05T02:52:19Z
dc.date.created2026
dc.date.issued16/1/2026
dc.description.abstractAcademic procrastination is a widespread challenge in higher education. Drawing on the context of undergraduate learning in China, this study aimed to: (1) examine the definition and components of academic procrastination among college students; (2) develop a Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) model to reduce academic procrastination; and (3) evaluate the effectiveness of the SRL model in reducing academic procrastination among undergraduates. The study was grounded in social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning theory. Participants were first-year undergraduates from Guangdong University of Science and Technology. Research instruments included semi-structured interview protocols, an academic procrastination questionnaire, and the SRL intervention model. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. In the main phase, 90 students were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 45) or the control group (n = 45). The experimental group received the SRL intervention, while the control group did not. The results revealed that: (1) academic procrastination among college students comprised six components—fear of failure, indecision, task aversiveness, resistance to control, dependency, and risk-taking; (2) the SRL model was structured around three phases—forethought, performance, and self-reflection—and implemented through systematic lesson plans; and (3) the SRL model significantly reduced students’ academic procrastination, with improvements maintained at the one-month follow-up. Specifically: (3.1) post-intervention and follow-up scores were significantly lower than pre-intervention scores at the .01 level, and (3.2) the experimental group scored significantly lower than the control group at both time points at the .01 level.en
dc.description.abstract-th
dc.description.degreelevel-en
dc.description.degreelevel-th
dc.description.degreenameDOCTOR OF EDUCATION (Ed.D.)en
dc.description.degreenameการศึกษาดุษฎีบัณฑิต (กศ.ด.)th
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir-ithesis.swu.ac.th/handle/123456789/3410
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.subjectAcademic Procrastinationen
dc.subjectSelf-Regulated Learning Modelen
dc.subjectUndergraduate Studenten
dc.subjectIntervention Modelen
dc.subject.classificationPsychologyen
dc.subject.classificationEducationen
dc.titleTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING MODEL ON ACADEMICPROCRASTINATION OF COLLEGE STUDENTSen
dc.titleอิทธิพลของการเรียนรู้การกํากับตนเองที่มีต่อการผลัดวันประกันพรุ่งด้านวิชาการของนักศึกษามหาวิทยาลัยth
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.typeปริญญานิพนธ์th

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
gs641150125.pdf
Size:
8.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
160 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: