Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir-ithesis.swu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2560
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorZHILIANG YUEen
dc.contributorZHILIANG YUEth
dc.contributor.advisorSugunya Ruangjaroonen
dc.contributor.advisorสุกัญญา เรืองจรูญth
dc.contributor.otherSrinakharinwirot Universityen
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T01:13:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T01:13:24Z-
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued15/12/2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir-ithesis.swu.ac.th/dspace/handle/123456789/2560-
dc.description.abstractThis study takes collocation, one of the most prevalent types of formulaic expression, as the focus, and aims to answer two questions: 1) what is the collocational competence profile of intermediate Chinese EFL learners? 2) how do specific learning modes affect the development of such competence? In essence, this study strives to provide reference value with regard to collocation competence profiling as well as its development. Two kinds of pedagogical treatments, namely, extensive reading and classroom training, serve as the independent variables. Four groups of Chinese intermediate learners were recruited and received different combinations of such treatments. During pretest and posttest, both spontaneous speaking and untimed writing data were collected and analyzed to probe into their implicit as well as explicit collocational knowledge. A random yet balanced piece of data from Corpus of Contemporary American English serves as a proxy of native speaker reference. Based on the analysis of six aspects (i.e. general lexical proficiency, collocational lexical proficiency, collocation density, collocation diversity, collocation accuracy rate, and collocation strength), it is concluded that one's collocational competence is related to and harder to develop than his/her general linguistic competence, and learners tend to produce less diversified and weaker collocations compared to native speakers. In terms of pedagogy, the matching between treatment type (i.e. implicit/explicit) and resultant knowledge type (i.e. implicit/explicit) is largely confirmed, and the combination of both treatments seem to provide the biggest gain, except for the aspect of collocation strength.en
dc.description.abstract-th
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSrinakharinwirot University
dc.rightsSrinakharinwirot University
dc.subjectcollocational competence profilingen
dc.subjectcollocational competence developmenten
dc.subjectlearning modeen
dc.subject.classificationSocial Sciencesen
dc.subject.classificationEducationen
dc.subject.classificationEducation scienceen
dc.titleTHE IMPACT OF LEARNING MODES ON THE DEVELOPMENTOF COLLOCATIONAL COMPETENCE OF CHINESE EFL LEARNERS  en
dc.titleผลจากวิธีการเรียนรู้ที่มีต่อการพัฒนาความสามารถในการใช้กลุ่มคำที่ต้องปรากฏร่วมกันของผู้เรียนภาษาอังกฤษชาวจีน th
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.typeปริญญานิพนธ์th
dc.contributor.coadvisorSugunya Ruangjaroonen
dc.contributor.coadvisorสุกัญญา เรืองจรูญth
dc.contributor.emailadvisorsugunya@swu.ac.th
dc.contributor.emailcoadvisorsugunya@swu.ac.th
dc.description.degreenameDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.)en
dc.description.degreenameปรัชญาดุษฎีบัณฑิต (ปร.ด.)th
dc.description.degreelevel-en
dc.description.degreelevel-th
dc.description.degreedisciplineen
dc.description.degreedisciplineth
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Humanities

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gs632150013.pdf8.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.